Skip to content
AgLE Online Review Open the reviewer

About AgLE Online Review

AgLE Online Review is a free, self-paced reviewer for candidates of the Philippine Agriculturist Licensure Examination. It organises board-style questions into the six examination subjects, explains every answer, and keeps a record of your performance so you can spend the study time you have left where it will actually move your score.

Who this is for

Agriculture graduates preparing for the board, whether reviewing full-time, working, or studying from outside the Philippines. A large share of AgLE examinees prepare abroad, and the reviewer is deliberately open to anyone, on any network, with no fee and no account.

It is also useful to agriculture students well before board season — the banks map onto ordinary undergraduate coursework in crop science, animal science, soil science and agricultural economics.

How the reviewer works

Practice Mode

Untimed, with instant grading and a full explanation on every item.

Exam Mode

Sixty seconds per question, results withheld until submission, auto-submitting at zero.

Bloom's Taxonomy sessions

A session can be pitched at Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating or Creating, so the same bank supports early recall work and later judgement work.

Progress, bookmarks and history

Readiness, accuracy and per-subject bests are computed from your attempt history — all of it stored in your own browser and never uploaded.

How the question bank is built

The bank currently holds 3,300 distinct questions. That number is worth being precise about: every item is a separate question, not the same fact reworded twenty-five ways. An earlier version of this site did pad its counts that way, and the padding was removed rather than hidden, which is why some subjects report smaller numbers than they once did.

New material goes through extraction, generation, and a verifier that checks structure, grammar, clarity, subject relevance, duplication, and whether the keyed answer is actually supported by the source. Items that fail are corrected or rejected. Nothing reaches the shared bank without human approval.

What this reviewer is not

It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the Professional Regulation Commission or any review centre. It does not hold actual past board questions — the PRC does not release them, and any reviewer claiming otherwise is not being straight with you. The item bank is illustrative of the examination's coverage rather than a reproduction of any official Table of Specifications.

Start reviewing

Open the reviewer